But will drink another whisky Hi zrzka, sorry but I can't understand your idea, which between the following two: I assume this is something only apple could ever do. ![]() I have often though how cool would it be to have my iOS apps turn up as widgets under macOS. I have never really understood why they haven't done it. What is really needed is an iOS Emulator on the Mac. LOL, I am close to deleting this reply again. Then even better if you could run the code and have it show up in an emulator window on the mac. My simple understanding of maybe how it could be done is running a server app in StaSh that you connect to from a P圜harm Plugin to be able to load projects(directories) and edit them in P圜harm and sync them back to Pythonista. But if it could be done it would be great to be able to code from P圜harm to Pythonista. It seemed like it would be very hard for anyone to do. These are only some key points to think of a more powerful use of great, I was actually thinking the same thing. good integration with Pythonista IDE, that is:Ī) the output of any work performed with the remote Python should be imported easily inside Pythonista console or variables manager (so 2d or 3d plots, videos, images, arrays, pretty printed latex formulas, etc.) ī) all files that are saved inside the remote hard-disk should be saved also inside Pythonista, if user wants (backup) Ĭ) with smartphone it is good, in my opinion, to perform some tasks with the minimum number of keys to touch, so if user is coding his main script with Pythonista and the script needs to link to the remote Python core to perform some tasks that Pythonista can't do (scipy, pandas, fipy, etc.), it would be a good idea to allow user to use the remote core with functions that are executed inside the main script: to run the script user should only touch the classical key |> that executes pure-Pythonista pieces of code, then executes not-pure Pythonista pieces of code with the remote service, then executes pure-Pythonista pieces of code with the output of the remote service, and so on.possibility to install/setup not-pure Python libraries inside the remote Python core as user can not install not-pure python libraries in Pythonista, he should at least install them with the remote Python core (that, most likely, should have a built-in set of compilers to build libraries written with combination of C,C++,Fortran, etc.).free account with login (with pay option if user wants more features or more computation power).In my opinion, the key points for an addition of "batteries" available online through a remote full working Python with X Gb of ram, Y cpu power and Z Gb of storage (for saving scripts or full projects) are: Hi zrzka, in my opinion it is a good idea to have a full working Python environment that works remotely for any tasks that Pythonista alone can not perform (due to the lack of not-pure python built-in libraries for internal storage limits, certainly not due to its very nice and powerful IDE and files manager).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |